Trains and Tracks
This just came to mind in the morning. It is something somebody asked a long time ago and I still think it is meaningful.
There were 2 railway tracks running parallel to each other. One was an old track that was no longer in use, but there is still an intersection linking the 2 tracks together; remnant of the time when the new track was constructed and time was needed to migrate all train routes to the new track. A sign had been put up to warn people not to trespass on the new track.
One day, a group of children decided to play on the railway tracks. One of the boys saw the sign and informed the others, but all they did was to laugh it off and continued playing on the new track. A lone boy decided it was safer playing on the lone track and decided to play there by himself.
Half an hour later, a train traveling at full speed appeared. The train driver did not spot the children playing on the new track until it was too late to brake the train. If you are the train driver, what would you do? Would you run down the group playing on the new track or the lone boy playing on the old track (assuming you can switch the link and go onto the old track)?
There is no right or wrong answer.

4 Comments:
Stay on the new track, but try to sound the horn ASAP. Idea is the same as driving. As long as you've taken reasonable care in your driving, i.e. not speeding, looking in all directions as best as possible, etc. You can only take so many precautions, cos if someone wants to dash out of the road suddenly, there's not much you can do, but sound the horn and try to brake as safely/quickly as possible. No point swerving or doing other actions to miss knocking down the roadrunner if you're gonna kill others on the road. The pedestrian also has a responsibility to use the roads in a safe manner.
You're the first person I know who chose to continue on the new track. I too chose to remain on the new track, but my reasoning was not the same as yours. My reasoning: why should the lone boy be penalized for not being an idiot.
Sacrificing the intelligent for the stupid masses is just not my style.
I mean, ok, this sounds very govt, but rules are there, if you want to break it, you have to take any possible consequences. If its such a simple thing as deciding where to stand on a road, why should anyone sacrifice for you if you suddenly decide to stand in the way of a car in lane 4 of the CTE?
I dunno, but knocking down an errant pedestrian seems to be more correct than crashing into 5 other cars and causing a 20 vehicle pileup on a road. Well, at least less damage to the car... Hey if you suddenly swerve, the vehicle may flip. What if the train gets derailed and the passengers die? The death toll will be serious if train is full, the legal troubles worse.
But then, sorry lor, if its a bunch of kids on the new track and a bunch of cows on the old track, I'd still go ahead and knock down the kids. Ha, like I have a choice from all that inertia and momentum the train has. No difference what life it is, its still a life. Just too bad for the one in the wrong position when there's no way of prevention. Not as if I'd be happier killing off any of them.
Heh, more fun killing in RPG. playing dungeon siege 2 now. at least there's no blood/gore to clean up...
Run down those idiots
Post a Comment
<< Home